Transvaginal Mesh Maker Changes Warning Label; FDA Issues Warning

Transvaginal Mesh Warn LabelBetter late than never when it comes to warnings on potentially harmful medical devices, but the harm will only stop when the use of defective medical devices stops. Boston Scientific, a maker of transvaginal mesh and slings, is confronting the reality that its product can cause serious harm to patients. In June the company announced its products will carry a new warning label. Transvaginal mesh is used to treat common pelvic disorders in women, which you can read about here.

Boston Scientific is facing more than 36,000 product liability cases because of injuries the mesh has caused, including infections and erosion of surrounding tissue, according to the Minneapolis Star Tribune. Transvaginal slings are used as treatment for incontinence and surgical meshes are surgically implanted to strengthen tissue in women suffering from pelvic organ prolapse.

New Warnings

The warnings include additional language to existing warnings concerning:

  • “Erosion” and “ongoing pain” as possible side effects, and
  • The company’s meshes and slings should be considered permanent implants because taking them out can be complicated or impossible but the new warnings also state treatment for erosion caused by the mesh may require at least an attempt at surgical removal of the device.

The company announced the warnings in June as part of “urgent” advisory letters sent in May to physicians worldwide. Those letters were followed by announcements from European regulators that publicized warning label changes. The changed warnings apply to:

  • Five brands of transvaginal slings (Advantage, Lynx, Obtryx, Obtryx II and Solyx), and
  • Three types of mesh (Uphold LITE, Pinnacle LITE, and Upsylon Y).

Boston Scientific states the changes to the warning label are a result of a review of data by company officials and Australian medical device regulators.

Woman suffering from transvaginal mesh

The patients harmed by Boston Scientific’s products make a number of legal claims including that its transvaginal mesh’s design and manufacturing are flawed, that it failed to warn of known dangers in the past, and that the company breached warranties and violated consumer protection laws.

Securities filings by Boston Scientific state it has settled about 11,000 of these cases without admitting liability or wrongdoing. One source estimates there are about 100,000 lawsuits by those harmed by vaginal mesh and more than 135,000 worldwide.

Counterfeit Raw Material

In addition to all the issues that arise when transvaginal mesh is manufactured to Boston Scientific’s specifications, the company may have used the wrong raw material in making some of its products, adding yet another complication for patients. The federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued its own warning to physicians in April that it was investigating allegations Boston Scientific used counterfeit raw material for its transvaginal mesh, according to the Boston Globe.

FDA stated the company will conduct new tests on the safety and effectiveness of the product and the agency will review the results. Boston Scientific has denied that has used “‘counterfeit’ or ‘adulterated’ materials” in its medical devices.

The Takeaway

Warnings are a step in the right direction so patients can have a better idea as to the risks involved with TVM, but if the products are used anyway warnings won’t prevent harm to patients. Eliminating all risk of injury will occur only when transvaginal mesh is no longer used. That will only happen if:

  • Manufacturers decide to step selling it,
  • Doctors decide to stop implanting it,
  • Patients refuse to use it, or
  • The FDA decides to ban it.

Until then patients will continue to be injured by transvaginal mesh and lawsuits against manufacturers such as Boston Scientific will continue to be filed. These lawsuits not only compensate plaintiffs for the injuries they’ve suffered but they also increase the cost of doing business as usual for companies like Boston Scientific. They may eventually decide profits from selling transvaginal mesh aren’t worth the costs and stop selling these products.


Client Reviews
I was involved in a case for the faulty hip replacements. Clay Hodges represented me. I can't say enough about how much he has helped me. Clay was able to win multiple settlements on my behalf with most of them being the maximum amount able to be awarded. Matt J.
Clay, thank you sir for making a disheartening experience at least palatable, you and your staff were honest, caring and understanding through the entire process of my wife’s hip replacements, while monetary settlements never make the pain and suffering end, it sometimes is the only way people can fight back to right a wrong. J. V.
We are absolutely pleased with how Clay Hodges handled my husband’s hip replacement claim. He always kept us informed of the progress. And, his work resulted in a settlement which we are extremely pleased. Thank you, Clay! Carol L. & Norm L.
Contact Information